Spirituality is seen by many as a gentle, individual alternative to the dogma and dangers of organised religion. But critics argue the distinction is less convincing than it appears. A survey across 22 countries concluded that while large numbers identify as ‘spiritual but not religious’, they still nevertheless held recognisably religious beliefs, from belief in an afterlife to realms beyond the physical world. Moreover, spirituality and religion consistently blur together, sharing overlapping functions, meanings, and psychological effects. With troubling real-world consequences. Critics argue New Age concepts about hidden truths increasingly animate conspiracy movements, providing a spiritual gloss for everything from alternative medicine to QAnon, endangering public health and fostering social division and prejudice.
Is spirituality simply religion by another name? Should we reject both alike as unfounded and potentially dangerous dogma? Or is it possible to reject the superstition and retain a considerate, benign approach that provides a personal way of making meaning in an uncertain world?
Is spirituality simply religion by another name? Should we reject both alike as unfounded and potentially dangerous dogma? Or is it possible to reject the superstition and retain a considerate, benign approach that provides a personal way of making meaning in an uncertain world?
